|
Sundance
Review
Stephanie Daley is the strongest proof I've
seen
this year that the Sundance Lab – designed to give emerging filmmakers the
creative and financial support they need to raise their game – is doing
something right. The film is beautifully – and by all appearances
expensively
– shot, and its cast (toplined by executive producer Tilda Swinton and Amber
Tamblyn, whose rabid Joan of Arcadia fanbase surely helped to get
this
film made) is full of name actors, and from afar it has every visual marker
of a
high-gloss, commercial thriller. But writer-director Hilary Brougher (she
was
last here in 1997, with her debut, The Sticky Fingers of Time) has
hardly made a Hollywood confection. Daley is essentially a non-linear case
study
of the psychological swirl around two parallel pregnancies: that of Lydie, a
40-ish forensic psychologist whose marriage and psyche are still recovering
from
a stillbirth, and the mysterious case of the title character (Tamblyn), a
high
schooler on trial for throwing her newborn daughter in a trash can. Right
before
her scheduled pregnancy leave, Lydie is asked by the prosecutor's office to
conduct a series of examinations with Stephanie, who claims innocence and
refuses to take a plea deal. It's Liddy's job to get Stephanie to talk, and
the
young girl's story, told through flashback, is woven through the older
woman's
trepidatious third trimester, as she worries for health, doubts her
husband's
fidelity, and tries to come to terms with the child she's already lost. The
material, in different hands, could have easily have drifted into Lifetime
movie
territory, but Brougher brings a fearless spirit to the thing. There's a
rawness
to Stephanie Daley that we rarely see in American film – it paints
slick composition and beautiful, bleeding color on the kind of story about
sex
and faith that no one has told well since before Lars Von Trier decided to
tackle American imperialism with Brechtian critique.
Before the events in question, Stephanie's only tragedy is that she's sadly
ordinary. A shy but precocious teen, she's young enough to still feel bound
to
her religious mother and internet-addict father, but just old enough to
start
pursuing an urgent curiosity about sex. One summer night, she follows
"faster" friend Rhana (The Squid and the Whale's Halley
Feiffer, again doing impeccably natural work) to a party. A friend of a
friend
of a friend's parents are out of town; an older brother has picked up a keg;
and
Stephanie has tarted herself up in eyeshadow and miniskirt, more to impress
Rhana than any particular boy. Add in Stephanie's simultaneous desperate
need to
be touched, and near total sexual naivety, and it's not hard to imagine
what's
going to happen when the cute boy manning the keg cocks his head and asks
her
name. Sure enough, there's an empty master bedroom upstairs, and sure
enough,
young Cory wants to do more than kiss. Stephanie's deflowering comes to an
end
with a loud pounding on the door – another pair of young "lovers"
want their turn – and with those ever-assuring three little words from the
mouth of her suitor: "I didn't come." Nine months later, on a
school
ski trip, she's collapsed from blood loss in the snow; five months after
that,
she's pushed to Liddy's door.
Stephanie's story seems to change slightly every time she shows up for
forensic
analysis. In the film's best conundrum, we have to wonder: is she crazy – or
is she just a teen? When so much of your daily existence, navigating
teachers
and friends and boys and parents – all of which Brougher wisely shows just
enough of to humanize Stephanie, without ever explaining her –
revolves
around pretending to be something and/or someone you're not, it takes a
certain
kind of skill to unpeel your layers and know which ones to throw out.
Luckily, Lydie is a born unpeeler. It's clear very early on that Lydie and
Stephanie are spiritual opposites: one is propelled by faith and feeling.
the
other, thinking and science. It would seem a simple enough dilemma – if
there's anyone who can untangle the God-basted lump of hormones and lies
that
sits before her, it's a woman so unsentimental that she was ready to
conceive
almost immediately after cremating a stillborn child. And, refreshingly,
Lydie
has relatively confident that she'll be able to get Stephanie to tell her
story.
She isn't a Law and Order-style, manic career woman, working all
hours
of the night in order to uncrack the code. She wouldn't have the time – her
own life requires too much emotional energy. Her marriage is both dependent
on
and crushing under the weight of her pregnancy, and just as she suspects her
husband of cheating, she simultaneously finds herself drawn to a male
friend.
She's not a woman without faith, but that faith is very secular, grounded
very
specifically in patterned behavior. To that end, when she finds a single,
diamond earring in the catbox, it's the pea under the mattress that causes
her
thin resolve to slip.
People will surely talk about the labor scene, which is as gut wrenching and
emotionally draining as anything I've ever seen. But the takeaway image of
the
scene – and the film – is a long, agonizing shot of Tamblyn's face, seen
through the cracks between the wall and door of a public restroom stall. if
you
walked into the theater by mistake during that shot, you'd think you'd
stepped
into a horror film. When you fully grasp the weight of what Brougher has put
her
heroine through, you realize that you're not far off.
cinematical.com Sundance Review Posted
Jan 25th 2006 by Karina Longworth
|